Eastern Plains irrigators
facing dire threat
| By Mike Thoren Guest columnist |
Wednesday, April 23, 2008 11:47 AM MDT |
Improved grain markets make this a period of greater prosperity for many families and communities on the Colorado eastern plains. These circumstances may be very short lived, however, if ground water wells in the Northern High Plains designated ground water basin are forced to shut down, as 10 owners of 650 irrigated acres in the Pioneer Irrigation District, east of Wray, contend is necessary to provide them with more summer surface water diversions through the Pioneer Ditch.
The Pioneer landowners filed a lawsuit
in 2005, claiming that the Colorado Ground Water
Commission must redraw boundaries of the ground water
basin to exclude hundreds of wells, and to require
pumping of those wells to be regulated and curtailed as
junior to Pioneer’s surface diversions from the
Republican River. The lawsuit is scheduled for trial in
June 2008 in Wray. Pioneer claims that the “new
boundary” for the designated basin “will have to be
greater than 15 miles out from the river” and that all
wells within that new boundary should be shut down. Much
public concern appears to exist with the potential
impacts to well users of the state of Colorado’s efforts
concerning the Republican River Compact. However, the
same level of attention and concern by those whose
interests are directly at stake, does not appear to be
focused on the entirely separate threat posed by the
actions of the Pioneer landowners — a threat with the
same potential for disastrous consequences as the
curtailment of wells for Compact purposes.
Information related to Pioneer’s claims that may not be
well known includes the following:
1. A “15 mile” boundary would shut down nearly 1,000
wells, and would include over 130,000 irrigated acres.
Municipal wells for Wray and Eckley would be shut down,
too. Yuma’s wells would be threatened with curtailment
as well, if the boundary was set at anything greater
than 15 miles. Depending on how much “greater than 15
miles” the boundary is drawn, if the Pioneer land owners
are successful, many other wells could be impacted.
2. The Pioneer landowners only irrigate about 650 acres.
3. The Pioneer landowners’ claim that they don’t have
enough irrigation water in June, July and August (who
does in Colorado?), is identical to conditions that
existed long before substantial well pumping occurred in
the basin. A 1940 U.S. Bureau of Reclamation water
evaluation report states, “field investigations and
hydrographs of the Pioneer Canal diversions indicate
that this canal and other ditches junior to it in
priority suffer severe water shortages in June, July,
and August of each year... .”
4. There are two separate and
independent forces at work threatening the continued
operation of wells in the Republican River Basin. They
are:
The local communities and well users potentially impacted by Pioneer’s lawsuit need to actively come together, and encourage and support further efforts by local ground water management districts, and Colorado, to resist the potentially devastating outcome sought by Pioneer landowners. Turning a blind eye to the situation, or hoping someone else will protect your interests, is not a prudent path to take.
Mike Thoren is CEO and president of Five Rivers Ranch Cattle Feeding LLC.

